reviewed by Dominick Grace
Kees de Groot, ed.
Comics, Culture, and Religion: Faith
Imagined. New York: Bloomsbury
Academic, 2024. 264 pp. US $39.95 (Paperback). ISBN: 978-1-3503-2162-5. https://www.bloomsbury.com/us/comics-culture-and-religion-9781350321588/ (open access - free download)
Comics,
Culture, and Religion: Faith Imagined, edited by Kees de
Groot, adds to the growing list of books addressing religion in comics (2024
also, see Grafius and Morehead’s Horror Comics and Religion). The book
also participates in the growing trend towards globalism in comics scholarship.
While American texts, such as Maus, Watchmen, and Craig
Thompson’s Habibi, are addressed, the book also covers European,
Japanese, and Indian texts, and others on religions other than Christianity.
These features are all to the good. While not every chapter, perhaps, will be
of use to every reader, anyone interested in the range of comics with religious
elements, and/or the relationship between comics and religion per se,
will find material of interest here, and scholars interested in the specific
topics of individual chapters will wish to check those ones out, at least. The
scholars, whose work appears here, are mostly European, so though the lens
through which most look is Western, it is not, with a couple of exceptions,
North American. This is also all to the good. Diversity of topics and of
scholarly voices remain important to the growth and robustness of scholarship
generally, and comics scholarship specifically, given that comics are a
worldwide phenomenon, but comics scholarship has not, as yet, fully encompassed
that global reality.
Nevertheless,
this collection is a mixed bag. The chapters are all in English, but many of
the authors are not native speakers, so the prose can be stilted and
occasionally, grammatically flawed. This might seem like a niggle, but careful
editorial oversight should have been able to smooth out such infelicities
without compromising the authors’ voices. Furthermore, the scholars included
are not, generally, comics scholars per se, but rather religious studies
scholars, who do bring an important perspective to a book on comics and
religion, but who also do not always have the depth of comics knowledge or
focus on comics-specific aspects of what they discuss that comics scholars may
be looking for. The books’ approach is also oriented more towards social
science than humanities, which is hardly a limitation or flaw, but it does mean
that comics scholars more on the humanities side of the discipline may find
this book less useful than will their social sciences colleagues. (Full
disclosure: I come from the humanities,
so the methodologies and interests of some of these papers fall outside my own
areas of practice, interest, and knowledge.)
The book is
divided into four parts. As de Groot writes in his introduction:
The
first part, Comics in Religion, starts with religions. How do religious communities
and institutions use comics to communicate with their audience and why and when
do they protest against them? The second part, Religion in Comics, starts
with comics. How are religious beliefs, rituals, symbols, leaders, stories, and
practices represented, criticized, and discussed in comics? The third part,
Comics as Religion?, discusses the cultural role of comics in cultivating a sense
of the sacred and making meaning (7-8). Part four, Learning from Comics, asks,
“What and how do comics teach about culture, about religion, and about the
intertwinement of the religious and the social?” (8).
The quality
of the essays varies considerably. Some are well written and researched, and
clearly argued; others fail on one or more of these fronts. Many of the essays
also don’t seem to me to end up having much of use to say. For instance, Paula
Niechcial’s “The Reception of Comics on Zoroastrianism” sounded like it would
offer a useful exploration of quite an esoteric (to me) topic. However, her
quantitative study of the reception of two comics had very low responses--in
the case of one of the comics she was asking about, only one of her 91
respondents indicated being familiar with it. Consequently, it is difficult to
reach reliable conclusions about responses to these comics, based on this
research. Others drift from the book’s focus. For instance, the one on “The
Magic of the Multiverse: Easter Eggs,
Superhuman Beings, and Metamodernism in Marvel’s Story Worlds,” by Sissel
Undheim, has much more to say about film and TV than the comics--and there is
much one might discuss about how Marvel Comics have treated (or mistreated)
religion. Line Reichelt Føreland’s “Comics and Religious Studies: Amar Chitra Katha as an Educational
Comic Series” offers useful information on comics as educational tools and on
the history of the comics she is discussing, but does not really answer her
opening question: “How can comics
be used in religious studies?” (205; my emphasis). What would have seemed to me
obvious examples to consider of comics that try to proselytize--Spire comics,
Jack Chick tracts, for instance--are not even mentioned.
On the other
hand, several pieces are strong, whether on comics familiar to North American
readers. For instance, in “Implicit Religion and Trauma Narratives in Maus and
Watchmen,” Ilaria Biano’s exercise in “framing Maus and Watchmen in the context of the implicit
religiosity of their traumatic narratives” (141) offers useful insights into
these canonical comics in their cultural context. Evelina Lundmark tackles the
weaponizing of online outrage to attack comics that don’t conform to a
particular religious orthodoxy in “Cancelling the Second Coming: Manufactured Christian Outrage Online,”
offering valuable insights. Irene Trysnes provides what is, for an outsider, an
excellent analysis of the use of religion in Norwegian comics, in “From
Subordinates to Superheroes? Comics in Christian Magazines for Children and Youth
in Norway.” Christoffe Monotte takes a new look at Eisner’s A Contract With
God in terms of “sociology of religion and migration sociology” (222), in “A
Contract with God or a Social Contract?” Other papers were on Preacher,
on Craig Thompson’s Habibi, junrei manga, the comics of Kaisa and
Christoffer Leka, and other topics.
The final
words of the conclusion are, “To be continued.” This is a fair conclusion. This
volume is to be commended for its exploration of a diverse array of comics
through a religious studies lens, but it also leaves room for additional work. The
exploration of religion and/in comics does indeed need to be continued further
than it goes here.
Table of Contents
Introduction: Comics and Religion in Liquid Modernity, Kees de Groot (Tilburg University, Netherlands)
Part I: Comics in Religion
1. From Subordinates to Superheroes? Comics in Christian Magazines for Children and Youth in Norway, Irene Trysnes (University of Agder, Norway)
2. Cancelling the Second Coming: Manufactured Christian Outrage Online, Evelina Lundmark (Uppsala University, Sweden)
3. The Reception of Comics on Zoroastrianism, Paulina Niechcial (Jagiellonian University, Poland)
Part II: Religion in comics
4. Drawn into Krishna: Autobiography and Lived Religion in the Comics of Kaisa and Christoffer Leka, Andreas Häger and Ralf Kauranen (Åbo Akademi University, Finland)
5. What Would Preacher Do? Tactics of Blasphemy in the Strategies of Satire and Parody, Michael J. Prince (University of Agder, Noway)
6. Islam and Anxieties of Liberalism in Craig Thompson's Habibi, Kambiz GhaneaBassiri (Reed College, USA)
Part III: Comics as Religion?
7. Implicit Religion and Trauma Narratives in Maus and Watchmen, Ilaria Biano (Istituto Italiano, Italy)
8. Manga Pilgrimages: Visualizing the Sacred / Sacralizing the Visual in Japanese Junrei, Mark MacWilliams (St. Lawrence University, USA)
9. Comics and Meaning Making: Adult Comic Book Readers on What, Why and How They Read, Sofia Sjö (Åbo Akademi University, Finland)
Part IV: Learning From Comics
9. The Magic of the Multiverse. Easter Eggs, Superhuman Beings and Metamodernism in Marvel's Story Worlds, Sissel Undheim (University of Bergen, Norway)
10. Comics and Religious Studies: Amar Chitra Katha as an Educational Comic Series, Line Reichelt Føreland (University of Agder, Norway)
11. A Contract with God or a Social Contract? Christophe Monnot (University of Strasbourg, France)
Conclusion: Comics as a Way of Doing, Encountering, and Making Religion, Kees de Groot (Tilburg University, Netherlands)
Bibliography
Index