Articles from and news about the premier and longest-running academic journal devoted to all aspects of cartooning and comics -- the International Journal of Comic Art (ISSN 1531-6793) published and edited by John Lent.

Showing posts with label environmentalism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label environmentalism. Show all posts

Wednesday, May 14, 2025

Interview with Holler Author, and Climate Justice Activist, Denali Sai Nalamalapu

 Interviewed by Cassy Lee

 Denali Sai Nalamalapu . Holler: A Graphic Memoir of Rural Resistance, Timber Press, 2025. ISBN: 9781643265230, $21.99. https://www.hachettebookgroup.com/titles/denali-sai-nalamalapu/holler/9781643265230/?lens=timber-press

 Denali Sai Nalamalapu is a climate activism organizer from Southern Maine and Southern India. Denali lives in Southwest Virginia. They have written for Truthout, Prism, and Mergoat Magazine, and their climate activism has been covered in Shondaland, Vogue India, Self, The Independent, and elsewhere. They studied English Literature at Bates College and completed a Fulbright grant in Malaysia. You can find them at @DenaliSai on Instagram.

 Holler: A Graphic Memoir of Rural Resistance is their first book. In this powerful work of graphic nonfiction, Denali tells their own story of getting involved in climate activism and serves as a guide introducing readers to six ordinary people- a teacher, a single mother, a nurse, an organizer, a photographer, and a seed keeper - who became resisters of the Mountain Valley Pipeline, a project that spans approximately 300 miles from northwestern West Virginia to southern Virginia

The following video conference interview with Nalamalapu took place on May 12, 2025 and has been edited for clarity.

Cassy Lee: The title has such a clever double meaning— “holler” as in a rural Appalachian valley, and “holler” as in to get loud. I grew up in a rural area of California where climate activism was often seen as “treehugger” stuff. How did you find the courage to start “hollering?” Has this work made you feel more like an outsider in your hometown—or brought you closer to your community?

Denali Sai Nalamalapu: For me, coming from India to the U.S., I think I was kind of preprogrammed to hold nuances like what it means to be an environmental protector in a world and a country that often doesn't like activists, at least in a generalized form. And part of that's just because I am always, to some degree, an outsider either in the U.S. or in India, so I'm very used to things that I do not culminating in a sense of fitting in. Also, I am innately someone that feels injustice very deeply. So on top of living in the dynamic of always feeling like an outsider to some degree, I also regularly feel compelled to investigate and speak about injustice in a way that is not always welcomed by normalcy and certain communities and people who for different reasons would like to maintain the status quo. I think those two attributes about me as a person helped prepare me for the realities of being a climate activist, which is this interesting mix of caring about people and place even when people might not be excited about having you there. And I think as a queer and activist of color, there are even more nuanced layers [in me] than your average climate activist.

Generally, activists get portrayed as looking a particular way. But I was interested in telling this story in particular because the activists don't look a specific way. And I feel a sense of belonging in that reality, which is that, for example, one of the characters has lived on family land for seven generations from when her white ancestors settled on this land. And one of the individuals in the book is from the Monacan tribe who are indigenous to this land, and she came later in her life. She grew up in Baltimore and then came back to Appalachia where her ancestors once lived and the Monocan tribe currently is. It's been important to me to tell those nuanced stories because I think climate activists get sidelined in part because there's an unwillingness to really understand how diverse the movement is.

p. 22

CL: Why did you choose comics as your storytelling format? Your clean, consistent style—line drawings, limited palette, expressive characters—conveys so much with apparent simplicity. How did you develop this style?

DSN: When I was a child, my mom gave me a secondhand cartooning how-to book. I was really captivated by this way of interpreting people's faces in many different shapes and exaggerating different parts of them and making the landscape around them in some way part of the cartoon as well. And then as I grew older, I got more into traditional forms of writing and art that are respected more by people like my teachers or members of my family. For example, I got into things like portraiture and ceramics and printmaking, which tend to be more highly respected than comics. I think I was figuring out what my voice was and what felt authentic to me and what other people responded to. I was also really into writing and ended up studying English literature in college. Then when I was thinking about how the Mountain Valley Pipeline site had been communicated previously and what we hadn't done to communicate the struggle against this pipeline, comics and graphic novels came to mind. And I realized that I could merge my love for illustration and my skills in writing into the comics and graphic novel form.

I started consuming and creating more comics and, in reflection, I think of it as a full circle moment where I started with cartooning and learning how to write in my young childhood, and then diverged for thirty years, and then now came back to the form and feel really connected to it as a tool of climate communications. So often the narrative around climate change and the science of climate change is conveyed in black and white text. I think that leaves a lot of people out of the movement and unable to access the stories, but a form like comics where you can access information through the words, you can access information through the pictures, you can access emotions through the pictures. There are just so many different ways of absorbing different parts of the story for people of all ages and all levels of busyness, and that feels really important to me.

CL: I appreciated how the book begins with your personal connection to the land, then expands to feature stories of six everyday people who may not have considered themselves activists, but who took action against the Mountain Valley Pipeline in different ways. Was your goal always to have a balance between an element of both graphic memoir and comics journalism centered on a diversity of voices, or did that approach evolve as you got deeper into the project?

p. 156

DSN: When I started the project, I initially just wanted to profile six different activists, and their work and their stories. But as I worked with mentors and my editor and my agent on making my manuscript more accessible and sharpening it as one does during the editing process, we realized collectively that a guide with whom someone could walk through the stories and initially get to know and then learn along with could help the reader take in the nuances and the complexity and the, depth of each individual story. I think because of being socialized as female and especially being an Indian daughter, I was taught to be in the background and be more behind the curtain and uplift others. So it didn't come intuitively to put myself in the story.

p. 55

I am glad I did because I think a lot of environmental narratives get told with the person behind the curtain as sort of an unnamed omniscient narrator. But I think it's important for us to put ourselves into these stories sometimes because we are just as human and complex and flawed and nuanced as the people we're writing about. And so for the reader to get to see that, I think is an important marker of transparency and speaks to the reality that nothing is apolitical. There is a reason why I told this story, and there's a reason why I live in and am connected to Appalachia. And I wanted to share that with readers so that we could carry on together.

CL: Spoiler alert: despite years of resistance, the MVP began pumping gas in June 2024—even after pipeline ruptures during testing. A year later, what has the impact been on the community? Do some locals see benefits? What’s happening with the proposed extension to North Carolina—are protests ongoing?

DSN: I live in Southwest Virginia in one of the communities that's right next to the pipeline, and it has always been true that the pipeline was a project created to make a company money. It was never a project created because there was an existing need.

Scientists have long been certain that we don't need new fossil fuel projects. And particularly, the Southeast of the U.S. does not need more gas pipelines. Sometimes I think of the number of pipelines we have in the U.S. as similar to the number of highways we have. Like, if you look at a map of the pipelines in the U.S., it makes you dizzy. And so we never needed another one.

It's just that some CEOs decided that they wanted to take advantage of the Appalachian fracking boom in the twenty-tens and pumped out as many project proposals as they could to see what stuck and what didn't. So I would say that still stands today. The gas isn't needed in our communities. What we actually need are more renewable projects that can bring us into the future rather than drag us into climate demise. And then in terms of the Mountain Valley Pipeline Southgate Extension, the MVP and many other fossil fuel companies are continuing to be prolific in how many new fossil fuel projects they're proposing, including the MVP’s proposing an extension into North Carolina called the Southgate Extension.

p. 125

So right now, that project is trying to get regulatory approval to go into North Carolina and resistance continues, especially with indigenous led groups on the ground in North Carolina. But  next to that extension, there are dozens of other fossil fuel projects that are being proposed in Virginia and North Carolina. Resistance to those projects continues, as well as advocacy in the courts, because often the fossil fuel industry will target climate activists with really serious criminal and civil charges. Many activists in the Mountain Valley Pipeline movement were targeted with those charges and are still defending themselves in court. So that fight also continues in this misuse of the courts for this dying industry's aims, and is something that, for example, Enbridge, a big fossil fuel company, used as a tactic in the North Midwest of the United States to hurt Greenpeace, one of our biggest environmental groups in the country. The current federal administration is only stoking more fears that climate activists will be targeted in ways like they were with the MVP.

CL: There’s a poignant scene in which after the pipeline gets pushed through, you enter a period of depression. How do you keep hope alive? Are you focusing on new causes now? Any you’d like to highlight for our readers?

DSN: I think that an important part of climate activism is to redefine winning as not just 100% sunny circumstances, but rather as a reality that holds more realistic complexity. For example, winning the climate fight doesn't necessarily look like a pristine utopia, and losing the climate fight doesn't necessarily look like complete demise, but rather there's a complete gray area spectrum of possibility in between the two. It's similar with the Mountain Valley Pipeline fight. Like, some people, especially fossil fuel proponents, will say climate activists lost that fight. But there is a case to be made that ten years of community-led struggle and ten years of this pipeline getting tied up in the courts and in regulatory agencies because of its own ineptitude is a community win. I mean, so many community members, including the ones profiled in this book, built lifelong alliances and friendships and relationships from the pipeline fight. And I think that's an important part of being human is to build community with each other. So my hope is that we can redefine winning in a more nuanced way. Yes, we can always have long-term strategy and it's important to have long-term goals, but I think it's also really important to honor the work we do and did every day, and that's important to me when I think about the Mountain Valley Pipeline site. Yes, this one pipeline did go forward. But, also, the fossil fuel industry took note of how much resistance happened on the ground and especially in a marginalized and over-exploited region like Appalachia. They took note of the reality - that these people that they thought they could prey upon and would just be silent about it - weren't silent. So that's where I get my hope. I also think that I feel most authentically connected to the communities and planet when I'm fighting for them. The surface level, “did we win?” sort of mentality feels less truthful. Even if one wins against one pipeline site, there are so many other fossil fuel projects that are being proposed in so many other communities enduring disproportionate burdens of environmental injustice, that we have to support and be in community with each other. So the reality is a lot more complicated than did one fight culminate in the end of a project or not.

Two things are making me feel very grounded right now. One is supporting local climate leadership on the city and state level. In a time where the federal administration is rolling back environmental protections and attacking states and local governments for their climate action, it's a really important and beautiful thing to lean into strengthening our state and local governments. Our localities along with our communities are on the front line of the climate crisis, especially in places like Louisiana and Florida and California, but also in places like Western North Carolina and Appalachia and other parts that aren't coastal. And so our localities are not only leading on climate action, but they aren't going to stop anytime soon even though the federal government is attacking their climate action. So what feels really helpful to me is both supporting local climate candidates in Southwest Virginia, but also there are so many mayors that are running on climate platforms that are really exciting in terms of municipal executive leadership and from there on up including Congress in Washington DC.

p. 113

The other thing giving me hope right now is mutual aid networks because I do think getting involved in local networks is not only an important thing to do in the present, but is also a radical reimagining of our future and a practical one in terms of making connections. You need to know who has a hammer in your neighborhood and who knows how to grow the best tomatoes. Those are very practical things that will be helpful. I mean, we just saw with bird flu what it was like to have eggs that cost $9 a dozen. I think it's important that we know who is resourced locally to weather storms that we've weathered before and that are increasingly impending, especially with corrupt administrations that only support billionaires. So mutual aid, both on the day-to-day level and broader, feels important to me. With both of those things, most people have a local government, and most people have at least a regional mutual aid network. So these feel, to me, like tangible things that we can do alongside any broader climate action that I think is still important. It's still important to gather in large numbers and show each other how many of us there are and other strategies that maybe seemed more like the go-to in hopeful times.

CL: Do you see yourself primarily as a climate activist or as a cartoonist/author/artist? You said this book was the hardest thing you’ve done. Do you see yourself doing more comics like this? What’s next for you?

DSN: I definitely think my organizing and my creative work are important together. They sort of feed each other. I don't think I see myself in the near future stopping either because my organizing work feels very practical. It feels like I can see the difference that I'm making in my relationships with people. I focus on communication, the media and social media. And my creative work feels like more of the slow deep work. I worked on Holler for three years, which is a lot longer than any specific organizing project, beyond stopping the Mount Valley Pipeline, which was a very big project. The creative work is longer than the day-to-day projects, and it's more playful and colorful, and it's the stuff that feels like it's what I would be doing if the world was a better place. So I guess they kind of balance each other out. The organizing work fills a part of me that feels like I can't just sit and watch the world burn. And the creative work is partially that, but it's also really fun, so it gives me energy to do the organizing.

I find it really helpful to have multiple projects moving at once because otherwise, I put too much pressure on myself for one project. I don't think it's actually reasonable to be so worked up about one thing that I’m doing, so I like having multiple projects. And these days, what I'm thinking about is middle grade and young adult fiction and what it could be like to tell diverse stories of environmental resistance for and from the perspective of young people. In a different way, I don't think we can look to any one source right now to tell our story of climate hope. So what does it look like for us to write that story into existence? Those are the two general projects I'm working on right now.

CL: Who did you imagine your audience to be while writing? What do you hope readers take away from the book?

DSN: I remember the first reader that came to mind is the grandchild of a nurse who reads the story of Karolyn Givens and feels connected to her story because their grandmother was a nurse and then follows the book from there. I imagined just random people picking up the book and seeing that a college student is in the book and feeling a connection because they're a college student. I imagined people who are ordinary people who know about climate change and environmental destruction but maybe don't feel like they have the skills to do anything about it – they don't feel like their background is in forestry or sustainability or biology and feel sort of outside the movement. My hope is that they'll pick up the book and feel a connection to these stories and then start thinking about what's going on, where they are, and how they want to plug in with the skills that they have.

p. 32

Cassy Lee is a librarian and a comics artist, currently finishing up her MFA in Comics at California College of the Arts to bring these passions together. She is working on a graphic novel memoir about healing from the intergenerational trauma she experienced in her own rural childhood. You can see her work at cassylee.com.

All artwork is from Holler: A Graphic Memoir of Rural Resistance © Copyright 2025 by Denali Sai Nalamalapu. Published by Timber Press, Portland, OR. Used by permission of the publisher. All rights reserved.

Saturday, September 7, 2024

Book Review: Advocate: A Graphic Memoir of Family, Community, and the Fight for Environmental Justice by Eddie Ahn

 reviewed by Margaret C. Flinn

Eddie Ahn. Advocate: A Graphic Memoir of Family, Community, and the Fight for Environmental Justice. Ten Speed Graphics, 2024. 208 pp. US$24.99 (Hardcover). ISBN: 9781984862495; Ebook ISBN: 9781984862501. https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/729254/advocate-by-eddie-ahn/

 

The subtitle of Eddie Ahn’s Advocate, A Graphic Memoir of Family, Community, and the Fight for Environmental Justice kind of says it all. Graphic memoirs are numerous and it’s difficult to stand out. Ahn’s book is an engaging look at a particular intersection of identities and experiences: unique in as much as each individual is unique. The book gives insights into Ahn’s family’s trajectory from Korea to Texas (and return visits for various reasons), and Ahn’s own relocation to California, initially as an Americorps volunteer. The book flashes back and forward between different moment of Ahn’s family history, including a mélange of documents (details from diaries, maps, drawings of photographs) as is frequently seen in the graphic memoir. While the story focuses on Ahn’s own journey, it thus includes stories recounted to him by family members, or pieced together between family stories and material in his grandfather’s diary.

            If Ahn’s story stands out, it will probably be for its ordinary weirdness. He shares the quirks of his life, like playing poker and health issues in law school, and the financial struggles through his life that lead to unexpectedly amusing, if melancholy, details like calculating the cost of everything in its burrito math equivalent (a tank of gas equals four or five burritos)—the burrito being the expensive, filling, and nourishing meal of choice for Ahn, particularly through his early years in the Bay Area. Ahn is at once informative and banal, educating the reader through his own story about the vicissitudes of environmental and social justice, the constant challenges of immigration and racism in the U.S. and depicting a quiet passion and dogged labor that allow anyone to imagine that what Ahn has done is doable, although most of us never will. It also documents recent realities such as the way COVID-19 impacted community organizing and social justice work.

            The self-taught artist’s realist lines are clean and clear, with single color washes in a soft palette changing by page or panel and includes a brief annex regarding the making of the book and environmental justice work. In all, the book is readable and informative. Many readers will be able to relate to parts of Ahn’s story, and young readers may even be inspired by the non-glamorized yet dignified representation of doing meaningful work in today’s world.